+63.6%
CVS vs NIO
-62.3%
+125.9%
-44.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.3% | -0.4% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -6.7% | +5.1% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +0.4% | -20.0% | +20.4% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -0.4% | -30.5% | +30.0% | +0.1% |
| 6M | +25.1% | -20.7% | +45.9% | +25.6% |
| YTD | +23.9% | -25.7% | +49.6% | +24.4% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | -38.6% | +79.6% | +41.7% |
| 3Y | +63.6% | -62.3% | +125.9% | +64.7% |
| All | +63.6% | -62.3% | +125.9% | +64.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling