+112.8%
CVE vs UMAC
+494.0%
-381.2%
-49.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -3.1% | +1.7% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -0.9% | +3.4% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +16.7% | -7.7% | +24.4% | +16.8% |
| 3M | +9.3% | -26.4% | +35.7% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +43.6% | +61.9% | -18.3% | +39.4% |
| YTD | +93.6% | +86.5% | +7.1% | +86.4% |
| 1Y | +98.8% | +156.3% | -57.6% | +88.4% |
| All | +112.8% | +494.0% | -381.2% | +96.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling