+3.1%
CTSH vs NIO
-59.9%
+63.0%
-56.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +5.9% | -8.7% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -0.6% | +5.6% | -6.2% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +13.4% | -4.2% | +17.6% | +13.5% |
| 3M | +14.4% | -26.3% | +40.7% | +15.6% |
| 6M | +27.7% | -42.5% | +70.3% | +30.0% |
| YTD | -20.6% | -33.5% | +12.9% | -19.9% |
| 1Y | -9.1% | -52.7% | +43.5% | -6.7% |
| 3Y | +3.1% | -57.5% | +60.5% | +5.5% |
| All | +3.1% | -59.9% | +63.0% | +5.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling