+1.9%
CTAS vs GLXY
-41.9%
+43.8%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +5.2% | -7.0% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -14.6% | +15.8% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +12.8% | -36.2% | +48.9% | +11.7% |
| 3M | +10.3% | -30.1% | +40.4% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +32.0% | -56.1% | +88.1% | +31.2% |
| YTD | +19.1% | -38.9% | +58.0% | +18.0% |
| 1Y | +21.5% | -55.0% | +76.5% | +20.7% |
| All | +1.9% | -41.9% | +43.8% | -0.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling