+76.0%
CTAS vs GLDM
+104.2%
-28.1%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.8% | -1.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +4.7% | -3.5% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +12.8% | -0.9% | +13.6% | +12.8% |
| 3M | +10.3% | -4.3% | +14.6% | +10.5% |
| 6M | +32.0% | -13.4% | +45.4% | +33.2% |
| YTD | +19.1% | -5.8% | +24.9% | +19.0% |
| 1Y | +21.5% | +2.1% | +19.4% | +20.7% |
| 3Y | +76.0% | +105.0% | -29.0% | +46.9% |
| All | +76.0% | +104.2% | -28.1% | +46.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling