+66.3%
CTAS vs GFS
-20.0%
+86.3%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +1.5% | -1.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -1.8% | +1.0% | -2.8% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -8.6% | +8.4% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +11.7% | -46.5% | +58.2% | +16.6% |
| 6M | +0.7% | -4.8% | +5.5% | -2.9% |
| YTD | +7.4% | +29.7% | -22.2% | -1.6% |
| 1Y | -2.1% | +35.8% | -37.9% | -11.3% |
| All | +66.3% | -20.0% | +86.3% | +64.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling