+79.2%
CTAS vs FN
+80.0%
-0.8%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -14.2% | +13.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -16.0% | +19.8% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +15.5% | -40.1% | +55.6% | +16.2% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -43.9% | +56.6% | +13.3% |
| 6M | +34.5% | -55.6% | +90.1% | +36.1% |
| YTD | +21.3% | -35.7% | +57.0% | +19.3% |
| 1Y | +23.1% | -39.8% | +62.9% | +21.5% |
| All | +79.2% | +80.0% | -0.8% | +51.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling