+72.2%
CSX vs MTB
+109.6%
-37.4%
-29.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -0.1% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -3.4% | +1.7% | -5.1% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -3.1% | -4.2% | +1.1% | -1.6% |
| 3M | +7.2% | +8.9% | -1.7% | +3.4% |
| 6M | +16.2% | +10.9% | +5.3% | +11.2% |
| YTD | +37.5% | +21.5% | +16.1% | +26.9% |
| 1Y | +53.2% | +21.9% | +31.3% | +40.9% |
| All | +72.2% | +109.6% | -37.4% | +33.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling