-62.8%
CSGP vs ONTO
+97.2%
-160.0%
-72.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +6.2% | -8.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -1.0% | -3.0% | -4.0% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -2.9% | +5.2% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -2.5% | -5.7% | -9.7% |
| 6M | -35.1% | +28.2% | -63.3% | -38.5% |
| YTD | -54.0% | +69.8% | -123.8% | -58.0% |
| 1Y | -65.3% | +162.9% | -228.2% | -70.3% |
| All | -62.8% | +97.2% | -160.0% | -71.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling