-59.0%
CSGP vs MULL
+2,561.4%
-2,620.4%
-72.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +11.8% | -14.2% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +17.3% | -21.4% | -3.9% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +23.5% | -21.2% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -24.0% | +15.8% | -8.4% |
| 6M | -35.1% | +276.7% | -311.8% | -40.5% |
| YTD | -54.0% | +565.1% | -619.1% | -60.0% |
| 1Y | -65.3% | +2,802.6% | -2,867.9% | -74.4% |
| All | -59.0% | +2,561.4% | -2,620.4% | -72.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling