-62.8%
CSGP vs MTB
+109.6%
-172.4%
-72.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -0.1% | -2.3% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +1.7% | -5.8% | -4.6% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -4.2% | +6.5% | +3.7% |
| 3M | -8.2% | +8.9% | -17.0% | -10.7% |
| 6M | -35.1% | +10.9% | -45.9% | -37.4% |
| YTD | -54.0% | +21.5% | -75.5% | -57.1% |
| 1Y | -65.3% | +21.9% | -87.2% | -67.7% |
| All | -62.8% | +109.6% | -172.4% | -71.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling