-58.4%
CSGP vs LDOS
+35.4%
-93.8%
-72.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +0.1% | -1.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +13.9% | -3.7% | +17.6% | +15.3% |
| 30D | +16.0% | +16.4% | -0.4% | +10.5% |
| 3M | +6.1% | +7.4% | -1.3% | +3.6% |
| 6M | -8.2% | -0.3% | -7.8% | -9.0% |
| YTD | -52.3% | -24.0% | -28.3% | -49.2% |
| 1Y | -54.5% | -29.6% | -24.9% | -50.6% |
| All | -58.4% | +35.4% | -93.8% | -65.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling