-58.4%
CSGP vs HTZ
-81.0%
+22.6%
-72.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -20.8% | +19.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +13.9% | -7.7% | +21.6% | +14.3% |
| 30D | +16.0% | -13.1% | +29.1% | +16.7% |
| 3M | +6.1% | +14.7% | -8.7% | +4.0% |
| 6M | -8.2% | -70.6% | +62.4% | -2.8% |
| YTD | -52.3% | -65.2% | +12.8% | -50.5% |
| 1Y | -54.5% | -73.2% | +18.7% | -52.0% |
| All | -58.4% | -81.0% | +22.6% | -54.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling