-58.4%
CSGP vs BLDR
-48.1%
-10.3%
-72.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -5.8% | +4.1% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +13.9% | +3.9% | +10.0% | +12.9% |
| 30D | +16.0% | +16.5% | -0.5% | +11.9% |
| 3M | +6.1% | -13.7% | +19.7% | +8.6% |
| 6M | -8.2% | -12.2% | +4.0% | -7.3% |
| YTD | -52.3% | -36.3% | -16.0% | -48.8% |
| 1Y | -54.5% | -41.3% | -13.2% | -50.2% |
| All | -58.4% | -48.1% | -10.3% | -57.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling