+108.4%
CSCO vs ZM
+34.4%
+74.0%
-18.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.3% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +0.3% | -0.4% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -10.7% | -10.3% | -0.4% | -9.4% |
| 3M | -8.7% | -0.7% | -8.1% | -9.0% |
| 6M | +44.9% | +24.8% | +20.1% | +37.7% |
| YTD | +44.1% | +11.5% | +32.7% | +39.2% |
| 1Y | +65.9% | +12.3% | +53.5% | +59.6% |
| All | +108.4% | +34.4% | +74.0% | +86.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling