+113.5%
CSCO vs MCK
+112.3%
+1.2%
-18.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | +0.1% | +4.3% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -2.9% | +5.6% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -9.5% | +0.4% | -9.9% | -9.5% |
| 3M | -7.6% | +12.1% | -19.7% | -8.3% |
| 6M | +44.9% | -5.4% | +50.3% | +45.7% |
| YTD | +47.7% | +7.8% | +39.9% | +47.6% |
| 1Y | +69.1% | +22.9% | +46.1% | +68.2% |
| 3Y | +113.5% | +110.7% | +2.8% | +111.2% |
| All | +113.5% | +112.3% | +1.2% | +111.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling