+108.5%
CSCO vs BLDR
-54.9%
+163.4%
-18.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -4.9% | +4.9% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.3% | -0.2% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -10.1% | -16.2% | +6.1% | -8.9% |
| 3M | -11.7% | -14.4% | +2.7% | -11.0% |
| 6M | +40.1% | -32.8% | +72.9% | +44.1% |
| YTD | +43.8% | -39.2% | +83.0% | +49.2% |
| 1Y | +66.6% | -57.7% | +124.3% | +79.1% |
| 3Y | +108.5% | -55.3% | +163.8% | +119.2% |
| All | +108.5% | -54.9% | +163.4% | +119.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling