+122.5%
CRWV vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+222.4%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -7.0% | +6.9% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -5.4% | +5.0% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -24.8% | +7.4% | -16.8% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -62.8% | +55.7% | -8.3% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -99.5% | +108.1% | +15.9% |
| YTD | +24.3% | -99.8% | +124.0% | +37.1% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | -99.9% | +78.9% | -8.3% |
| All | +122.5% | -99.9% | +222.4% | +162.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling