+122.8%
CRWV vs PCG
-17.1%
+139.9%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.1% | -1.1% | -5.0% | -6.0% |
| 7D | +5.4% | +0.5% | +4.9% | +5.5% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -18.9% | +17.6% | -0.1% |
| 3M | -6.8% | -15.8% | +9.1% | -5.7% |
| 6M | +19.0% | -22.6% | +41.5% | +21.7% |
| YTD | +24.5% | -12.2% | +36.6% | +25.3% |
| 1Y | -23.9% | -7.1% | -16.8% | -25.0% |
| All | +122.8% | -17.1% | +139.9% | +172.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling