+122.5%
CRWV vs NVT
+203.3%
-80.8%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +4.6% | -4.8% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +4.1% | -4.5% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -5.1% | -12.3% | -12.3% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -1.2% | -5.9% | -5.2% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +46.6% | -38.0% | -27.4% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +60.0% | -35.7% | -23.5% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +70.8% | -91.8% | -53.4% |
| All | +122.5% | +203.3% | -80.8% | -37.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling