+122.5%
CRWV vs NIO
-5.4%
+127.9%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +3.1% | -3.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -2.9% | +2.5% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -18.7% | +1.3% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -29.4% | +22.4% | +3.9% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -32.5% | +41.1% | +22.8% |
| YTD | +24.3% | -27.6% | +51.9% | +36.7% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | -39.2% | +18.2% | -8.4% |
| All | +122.5% | -5.4% | +127.9% | +111.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling