+122.5%
CRWV vs MDLZ
-3.6%
+126.0%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | 0.0% | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +1.9% | -2.3% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -17.4% | +0.4% | -17.8% | -17.0% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -0.6% | -6.4% | -5.1% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +14.7% | -6.1% | +15.7% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +18.0% | +6.3% | +35.2% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +4.1% | -25.2% | -17.0% |
| All | +122.5% | -3.6% | +126.0% | +141.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling