+137.4%
CRWV vs LSCC
+98.1%
+39.3%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -1.7% | -3.2% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +17.3% | +1.4% | +15.9% | +16.6% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -10.0% | +17.7% | +15.1% |
| 3M | -3.6% | -16.1% | +12.5% | +7.3% |
| 6M | +27.6% | +27.4% | +0.2% | +10.6% |
| YTD | +32.6% | +56.9% | -24.3% | -0.9% |
| 1Y | -5.3% | +74.6% | -79.8% | -32.6% |
| All | +137.4% | +98.1% | +39.3% | +48.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling