+149.6%
CRWV vs LITE
+1,447.3%
-1,297.8%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LITE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.7% | +11.0% | +0.7% | +6.5% |
| 7D | +22.0% | +12.6% | +9.4% | +15.5% |
| 30D | +10.1% | +9.9% | +0.2% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +9.3% | -11.8% | -8.0% |
| 6M | +36.8% | +75.2% | -38.5% | +0.1% |
| YTD | +39.4% | +165.5% | -126.1% | -24.0% |
| 1Y | +6.7% | +555.0% | -548.3% | -70.7% |
| All | +149.6% | +1,447.3% | -1,297.8% | -69.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LITE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LITE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LITE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LITE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling