+122.8%
CRWV vs LDOS
-2.2%
+125.0%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.1% | +1.1% | -7.2% | -6.5% |
| 7D | +5.4% | -2.1% | +7.5% | +6.0% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -8.0% | +6.7% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +6.8% | -13.6% | -9.9% |
| 6M | +19.0% | -24.5% | +43.4% | +40.4% |
| YTD | +24.5% | -27.8% | +52.2% | +47.7% |
| 1Y | -23.9% | -27.4% | +3.5% | -12.0% |
| All | +122.8% | -2.2% | +125.0% | +46.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling