+122.5%
CRWV vs IBM
+2.7%
+119.8%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | IBM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +4.0% | -4.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +3.6% | -4.0% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -17.4% | +3.1% | -20.5% | -18.2% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -10.8% | +3.8% | -5.3% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -0.8% | +9.4% | +6.3% |
| YTD | +24.3% | -16.2% | +40.5% | +32.1% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | -2.9% | -18.2% | -27.1% |
| All | +122.5% | +2.7% | +119.8% | +81.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling