+122.5%
CRWV vs GLW
+265.7%
-143.3%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLW | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +2.0% | -2.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +7.8% | -8.3% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -0.4% | -17.0% | -17.0% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -5.6% | -1.5% | -8.3% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +26.7% | -18.1% | -20.9% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +91.0% | -66.8% | -46.2% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +122.4% | -143.4% | -71.5% |
| All | +122.5% | +265.7% | -143.3% | -60.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLW.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLW return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLW return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLW wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling