+137.4%
CRWV vs GLDM
+42.8%
+94.6%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | +0.9% | -5.8% | -5.3% |
| 7D | +17.3% | +0.2% | +17.2% | +17.1% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +0.3% | +7.4% | +7.5% |
| 3M | -3.6% | +3.3% | -6.9% | -4.9% |
| 6M | +27.6% | -14.5% | +42.1% | +30.9% |
| YTD | +32.6% | +1.9% | +30.6% | +44.3% |
| 1Y | -5.3% | +21.1% | -26.4% | +16.0% |
| All | +137.4% | +42.8% | +94.6% | +236.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling