-58.2%
CRWV vs GLDM
+2.8%
-60.9%
-64.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.9% | +3.7% | -13.6% | -12.7% |
| 7D | -24.3% | -0.3% | -24.0% | -24.1% |
| 30D | -44.6% | -1.9% | -42.7% | -43.5% |
| 3M | -47.3% | -0.4% | -46.9% | -47.2% |
| 6M | -61.4% | -10.1% | -51.3% | -58.2% |
| YTD | -32.4% | -5.8% | -26.5% | -24.4% |
| 1Y | -58.2% | +3.1% | -61.3% | -57.7% |
| All | -58.2% | +2.8% | -60.9% | -57.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling