+122.5%
CRWV vs EWT
+138.4%
-15.9%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EWT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +1.8% | -2.0% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -1.1% | +0.7% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -17.4% | +4.5% | -21.9% | -22.5% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +8.3% | -15.3% | -16.7% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +54.2% | -45.7% | -46.6% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +74.6% | -50.3% | -50.3% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +84.9% | -105.9% | -71.0% |
| All | +122.5% | +138.4% | -15.9% | -48.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EWT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EWT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EWT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EWT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling