+137.4%
CRWV vs EPAM
-33.8%
+171.2%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -0.5% | -4.4% | -4.8% |
| 7D | +17.3% | -2.2% | +19.5% | +17.6% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +17.8% | -10.1% | +5.1% |
| 3M | -3.6% | +19.9% | -23.5% | -5.8% |
| 6M | +27.6% | -21.6% | +49.2% | +41.2% |
| YTD | +32.6% | -44.0% | +76.6% | +63.1% |
| 1Y | -5.3% | -30.5% | +25.2% | +5.9% |
| All | +137.4% | -33.8% | +171.2% | +177.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling