+122.5%
CRWV vs EOG
+22.6%
+99.9%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EOG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +1.5% | -1.9% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -17.4% | +2.9% | -20.3% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +8.7% | -15.8% | -10.3% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +12.9% | -4.3% | -0.5% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +43.8% | -19.6% | -6.2% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +27.1% | -48.1% | -33.1% |
| All | +122.5% | +22.6% | +99.9% | +99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling