+122.5%
CRWV vs ENTG
+54.4%
+68.1%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +2.2% | -2.3% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +1.2% | -1.6% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -12.9% | -4.5% | -10.1% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -3.1% | -4.0% | -6.7% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +21.0% | -12.4% | -5.7% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +67.0% | -42.7% | -10.5% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +68.6% | -89.7% | -43.4% |
| All | +122.5% | +54.4% | +68.1% | +57.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling