+122.5%
CRWV vs EMB
+11.3%
+111.2%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EMB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.1% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -1.2% | +0.8% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -1.3% | -16.1% | -12.7% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -1.8% | -5.3% | +1.2% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +0.2% | +8.4% | +9.8% |
| YTD | +24.3% | +0.4% | +23.9% | +25.0% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | +2.8% | -23.9% | -28.6% |
| All | +122.5% | +11.3% | +111.2% | +41.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling