+51.9%
CRWV vs DECK
-23.2%
+75.2%
-76.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +24.7% | -1.6% | +26.3% | +24.9% |
| 7D | +25.5% | -0.8% | +26.3% | +25.6% |
| 30D | -24.3% | +4.9% | -29.2% | -24.9% |
| 3M | -32.7% | -5.8% | -26.9% | -32.3% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -8.6% | -38.5% | -47.1% |
| YTD | -15.1% | -14.7% | -0.4% | -14.0% |
| 1Y | -31.2% | +6.9% | -38.1% | -35.0% |
| All | +51.9% | -23.2% | +75.2% | +41.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling