+122.5%
CRWV vs AZO
-24.6%
+147.1%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.2% | 0.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -3.6% | +3.2% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -5.6% | -11.8% | -18.2% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -6.6% | -0.4% | -7.9% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -22.5% | +31.1% | +5.9% |
| YTD | +24.3% | -15.2% | +39.4% | +24.6% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | -33.9% | +12.9% | -24.4% |
| All | +122.5% | -24.6% | +147.1% | +114.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling