+137.4%
CRWV vs ASML
+155.5%
-18.2%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -2.0% | -2.9% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +17.3% | +2.8% | +14.5% | +14.9% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -0.2% | +7.9% | +8.5% |
| 3M | -3.6% | -2.6% | -1.0% | -1.3% |
| 6M | +27.6% | +27.9% | -0.3% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +32.6% | +62.4% | -29.9% | -12.8% |
| 1Y | -5.3% | +116.2% | -121.5% | -50.5% |
| All | +137.4% | +155.5% | -18.2% | -1.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling