+122.5%
CRWV vs ACM
-31.4%
+153.9%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +1.0% | -1.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -4.6% | +4.2% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -17.4% | +4.1% | -21.5% | -19.7% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -8.3% | +1.3% | -4.8% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -30.1% | +38.6% | +38.1% |
| YTD | +24.3% | -32.6% | +56.9% | +58.2% |
| 1Y | -21.0% | -49.6% | +28.5% | +38.2% |
| All | +122.5% | -31.4% | +153.9% | +82.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling