+122.8%
CRWV vs ABCL
+345.1%
-222.3%
-66.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.1% | -5.3% | -0.8% | -5.0% |
| 7D | +5.4% | -9.6% | +15.0% | +7.8% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +7.2% | -8.5% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +105.5% | -112.3% | -24.3% |
| 6M | +19.0% | +193.0% | -174.0% | -13.0% |
| YTD | +24.5% | +205.8% | -181.4% | -11.4% |
| 1Y | -23.9% | +144.4% | -168.3% | -42.8% |
| All | +122.8% | +345.1% | -222.3% | +48.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling