+382.4%
CRWD vs NIO
-64.4%
+446.8%
-44.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -2.4% | +1.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -4.1% | +6.3% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -23.2% | +15.5% | -6.0% |
| 3M | +28.9% | -29.9% | +58.8% | +32.1% |
| 6M | +91.5% | -25.1% | +116.6% | +94.8% |
| YTD | +77.3% | -27.5% | +104.8% | +80.5% |
| 1Y | +96.3% | -41.1% | +137.3% | +102.6% |
| All | +382.4% | -64.4% | +446.8% | +406.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling