+380.0%
CRWD vs LNT
+46.9%
+333.1%
-44.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | 0.0% | -1.0% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -1.0% | -1.9% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -4.2% | -2.5% | -7.7% |
| 3M | +19.6% | -6.7% | +26.3% | +17.7% |
| 6M | +87.1% | -3.6% | +90.7% | +85.7% |
| YTD | +76.4% | +5.9% | +70.5% | +77.7% |
| 1Y | +90.8% | +7.3% | +83.6% | +92.5% |
| 3Y | +380.0% | +46.5% | +333.5% | +419.0% |
| All | +380.0% | +46.9% | +333.1% | +419.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling