+351.1%
CRWD vs GLDM
+99.9%
+251.2%
-44.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.1% | -1.5% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -4.6% | +9.1% | +5.4% |
| 30D | -9.1% | -5.5% | -3.6% | -8.2% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -10.9% | +11.3% | +2.5% |
| 6M | +61.1% | -17.3% | +78.5% | +66.0% |
| YTD | +93.4% | -10.2% | +103.5% | +92.4% |
| 1Y | +71.1% | -6.9% | +78.0% | +68.2% |
| 3Y | +351.1% | +98.7% | +252.4% | +257.6% |
| All | +351.1% | +99.9% | +251.2% | +257.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling