+411.5%
CRWD vs GLDM
+130.1%
+281.4%
-44.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.9% | 0.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -0.5% | -1.9% | -2.3% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +4.4% | -2.9% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +18.5% | -1.1% | +19.6% | +18.5% |
| 6M | +109.1% | -13.7% | +122.8% | +113.9% |
| YTD | +81.8% | +2.8% | +79.1% | +77.2% |
| 1Y | +106.7% | +24.8% | +81.8% | +89.3% |
| All | +411.5% | +130.1% | +281.4% | +286.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling