+82.7%
CRS vs AZO
-32.5%
+115.2%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.2% | -1.0% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -6.8% | -3.6% | -3.2% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -16.1% | -5.6% | -10.6% | -16.0% |
| 3M | -21.2% | -6.6% | -14.5% | -20.8% |
| 6M | +8.7% | -22.5% | +31.2% | +10.3% |
| YTD | +41.0% | -15.2% | +56.2% | +48.0% |
| 1Y | +82.7% | -33.9% | +116.6% | +64.6% |
| All | +82.7% | -32.5% | +115.2% | +64.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling