+69.7%
CRH vs GLDM
+105.4%
-35.7%
-39.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.2% | +0.6% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -2.6% | -2.0% | -0.6% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +18.8% | -4.4% | +23.2% | +20.1% |
| 3M | -4.6% | -8.8% | +4.3% | -2.5% |
| 6M | -13.8% | -15.9% | +2.0% | -10.7% |
| YTD | -22.0% | -7.7% | -14.3% | -20.0% |
| 1Y | -13.6% | -3.6% | -10.0% | -11.8% |
| All | +69.7% | +105.4% | -35.7% | +27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling