+1,298.7%
CRDO vs ZTS
-59.6%
+1,358.3%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +0.2% | +1.5% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -3.7% | -0.7% | -3.6% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -0.8% | -38.5% | -39.2% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -9.7% | -28.7% | -37.2% |
| 6M | +40.6% | -38.4% | +79.0% | +61.9% |
| YTD | +13.2% | -41.1% | +54.3% | +32.1% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | -50.6% | +52.9% | +28.5% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | -59.1% | +1,001.7% | +1,275.7% |
| All | +1,298.7% | -59.6% | +1,358.3% | +1,683.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling