+942.5%
CRDO vs ZETA
+269.4%
+673.1%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.2% | +2.9% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -3.7% | -0.7% | -3.6% |
| 30D | -39.2% | +5.7% | -44.9% | -40.1% |
| 3M | -38.5% | +50.4% | -88.9% | -45.2% |
| 6M | +40.6% | +65.5% | -24.9% | +19.8% |
| YTD | +13.2% | +48.3% | -35.1% | -2.0% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | +45.4% | -43.1% | -11.7% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | +270.8% | +671.8% | +518.7% |
| All | +942.5% | +269.4% | +673.1% | +518.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling