+928.1%
CRDO vs USB
+101.7%
+826.4%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | USB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -0.3% | +4.2% | +4.0% |
| 7D | -26.7% | +1.4% | -28.2% | -27.5% |
| 30D | -24.1% | -1.3% | -22.8% | -23.7% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +15.2% | -36.8% | -28.1% |
| 6M | +66.3% | +18.8% | +47.5% | +49.6% |
| YTD | +18.5% | +21.0% | -2.5% | +4.5% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | +34.0% | -6.7% | +4.7% |
| All | +928.1% | +101.7% | +826.4% | +616.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside USB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus USB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × USB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded USB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling