-38.5%
CRDO vs UMAC
-1.0%
-37.4%
-47.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -2.5% | +4.1% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -3.4% | -1.1% | -3.8% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -15.1% | -24.1% | -39.0% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -10.8% | -27.7% | -42.9% |
| All | -38.5% | -1.0% | -37.4% | -42.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling