+942.5%
CRDO vs STZ
-49.6%
+992.1%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.1% | +2.7% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -4.5% | 0.0% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -8.6% | -30.6% | -40.2% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -13.8% | -24.7% | -39.7% |
| 6M | +40.6% | -17.2% | +57.7% | +37.3% |
| YTD | +13.2% | -9.4% | +22.6% | +10.3% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | -11.9% | +14.1% | -0.4% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | -49.6% | +992.1% | +888.3% |
| All | +942.5% | -49.6% | +992.1% | +888.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling