+974.3%
CRDO vs PLD
+21.6%
+952.8%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.0% | +2.1% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -0.7% | +2.3% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -30.0% | -2.2% | -27.8% | -29.3% |
| 3M | -28.3% | -7.4% | -21.0% | -26.6% |
| 6M | +44.8% | +1.9% | +42.9% | +41.7% |
| YTD | +16.7% | +7.9% | +8.8% | +11.0% |
| 1Y | +12.7% | +25.1% | -12.4% | -0.8% |
| All | +974.3% | +21.6% | +952.8% | +794.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling